From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com ([209.85.218.217]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB96z-0005so-9m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:40:00 +0100 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2409605bwz.12 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:38:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O2OxdvEKdrdOUidlK6fOd36TP/9K51ZgYP42TbmegG4=; b=k9/S0JsCG2OeNxZSf09XjUASRDSGhukIvlJKwjQ3xubSVdEAgZqB64etts5ujd4wfE IMM7xmDtnKXJSeDLu/ViXU3HfbwN8r04oKrG/NCRrk6mm3nwFEirLBQgVnxw+V4Nf0gd 0tNO3bC+DGEE1u8/59fGB/i9F2uSyzZAoFk5w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=YtDyFRwWXsXT3/fDQA2oL2J6w3svDrRdHRyWLjlcRoTCdZqomnSJtl5xRakgSOJOyP TjZJJezh08MqfLOdgsRnoZrP1Ht8F17QWULYNupFoe9cJMyw90VQEBrhaezf4nmmfYcb RDax7OEGAc/UBGXPV2QT/lzp6B3cvKZDKQADc= Received: by 10.204.11.6 with SMTP id r6mr166005bkr.29.1258645112381; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-251-67.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.251.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm804006fkt.31.2009.11.19.07.38.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:38:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB97U-0001Nk-97; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:40:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:40:28 +0100 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091119154028.GS919@mx.loc> References: <20091118114113.GC2919@mx.loc> <20091118123012.GD2919@mx.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091118123012.GD2919@mx.loc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.218.217 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Revert of 406cd0fee12ad99ba6d6f7d55f743cc4c6697955 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:40:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:30:12PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: >>Hello Bernhard, >> >>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>Since 406cd0fee12ad99ba6d6f7d55f743cc4c6697955 broke all >>>>glibc-internal-iconv builds and I'm too lazy/stupid to fix it >>>>properly for uclibc I reverted this commit. >>> >>> for unpatched uClibc you could just >>> TARGET_CPPFLAGS += -D_Exit=_exit >>> >>Thanks, and what's the patched uClibc alternative (and where's the >>patch)? It defines _Exit()? > >I suggest to just #define it to _exit, yes. >(glibc has it as weak alias but i'd prefer to get away with a define), >like: > >_Exit(): define to _exit() OTOH someone may want to override it locally, so to play safe let's follow suite: http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?h=0_9_30&id=e4adfdc4128c5909adeefecdaf870e30172922a9