From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com ([209.85.220.209]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB9cf-00085M-M6 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:12:44 +0100 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so2445466fxm.12 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:11:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8uVwFVn6KW+pqVdus+vo3c1MJdOKvZ2+f0Albw4Mm/s=; b=F10Kydb6T7Zw6lFNFxxic3LL2zY2Z9FxGR73AWPObk937A8zclVpWtvdymRZrlxDd3 4cq0ZzO9hbcGjC2sKLXjZSEdj3bPu9FJJ9YM6Q+N5ihqT6MUq124VHjlM9tOxX3huQIb o5es6vNaKpafeTYm4OEbfgmoWU91rK8Yc9Kp8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=oHc9D6/VkUv7/CVyc6sbUKb5HT+Iou/QTWtW5JBRpa6pndWR9loyXl7vUQqOL12+Xm WWi9qgC6aqSvy5ycX6Qy7gDKTbZluD65DCAvJfg8VQMuyxJ07bqdqYDwb0/mvzHYtSK6 QbK0WIugXOlcW40N9ZTmHV9lHHp6SvWCVg2ZQ= Received: by 10.204.10.2 with SMTP id n2mr175856bkn.91.1258647076760; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm236792fxm.4.2009.11.19.08.11.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:11:08 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091119161108.GC3366@jama> References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama> <1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258368570.5799.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258371591.5799.112.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258375022.16625.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.209 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SRCPV migration X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:12:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:02:05PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 16-11-09 13:37, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >I think we will have to hold off some of the SRCPV migration until > >bitbake has some kind of lock down functionality for the local build > >numbers. > > So at least 2 core developers (Richard, me) have said we shouldn't > use SRCPV for git stuff, and what do I spot today: > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=4f1f60e0f46324c6a968aff9bffeb727d98d5283 > > +PV = "0.0+1.0rc2+gitr${SRCPV}" > > FFS! Sorry for that :/ I'm merging stuff from shr/merge branch where its already used and it sliped through. Should I commit SRCPV->SRCREV now, or is it ok for now as there is also DEFAULT_PREFERRENCE = -1? which I also should set to -2 to ensure that won't be pulled instead of mplayer_svn :/. Sorry again.. -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa