All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:03:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091120090353.GE19778@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B06590C.7010109@cn.fujitsu.com>


* Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > (2) doing "perf kmem record" on machine A (think embedded here) and 
> > then "perf kmem report" on machine B. I haven't tried kmemtrace-user 
> > for a while but it did support both of them quite nicely at some 
> > point.
> 
> Everything needed and machine-specific will be recorded in perf.data, 
> so this should already been supported. I'll try it.

Right now the DSOs are not recorded in the perf.data - but it would be 
useful to add it and to turn perf.data into a self-sufficient capture of 
all relevant data, which can be analyzed on any box.

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:03:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091120090353.GE19778@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B06590C.7010109@cn.fujitsu.com>


* Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > (2) doing "perf kmem record" on machine A (think embedded here) and 
> > then "perf kmem report" on machine B. I haven't tried kmemtrace-user 
> > for a while but it did support both of them quite nicely at some 
> > point.
> 
> Everything needed and machine-specific will be recorded in perf.data, 
> so this should already been supported. I'll try it.

Right now the DSOs are not recorded in the perf.data - but it would be 
useful to add it and to turn perf.data into a self-sufficient capture of 
all relevant data, which can be analyzed on any box.

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20  7:53 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool Li Zefan
2009-11-20  7:53 ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  7:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Remove kmemtrace tracer Li Zefan
2009-11-20  7:53   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:20   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:20     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:24     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:24       ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:27       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:27         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:31         ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:31           ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:19   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:19     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:30       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:47       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:47         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  8:53         ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:53           ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  9:03           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-20  9:03             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  9:14             ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  9:14               ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20 14:42             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-20 14:42               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-20 16:41               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 16:41                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 17:52                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-20 17:52                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-23  6:51                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23  6:51                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23  7:22                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23  7:22                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23  7:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23  7:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 14:37                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-23 14:37                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-23 14:32                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-23 14:32                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-20  9:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  9:01           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  9:15           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20  9:15             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20 10:13             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 10:13               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 10:31               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20 10:31                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-20 10:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 10:49                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 14:46                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-23 14:46                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-23 17:53                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 17:53                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:20   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:20     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:54 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:54   ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-20  8:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  8:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  9:11   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-20  9:11     ` Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091120090353.GE19778@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.