From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:43:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:43:11 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20091120154311.GA9101@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20091118054555.GB28949@tansi.org> <4B03C5EE.7010702@gmx.net> <20091118102515.GB30910@tansi.org> <4B03D865.8070905@redhat.com> <4B03F5F2.9080609@redhat.com> <20091119074104.GC8694@tansi.org> <20091119092107.GA7875@fancy-poultry.org> <20091119122445.GA10856@tansi.org> <20091119130028.GA9415@fancy-poultry.org> <4B068840.6070508@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B068840.6070508@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] different default key sizes for CREATE and LUKSFORMAT List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 20.11.2009, Milan Broz wrote: > What about derive the MK digest iteration count from calculated keyslot > iteration time (I suggest 1/5 of calculated time) - so for default 1 second > it is cca 200ms - not accurate, because benchmark uses different message on input) > but with minimum 1000 iterations? Sounds fine to me (and is a good and practical idea, too). Thanks, Heinz.