From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:22:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:48259 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1494151AbZKTRV7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:21:59 +0100 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAKHKx86010986; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:21:02 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAKHKehe010970; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:40 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:39 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Wu Zhangjin Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, Nicholas Mc Guire , zhangfx@lemote.com, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Wu Zhangjin Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] tracing: add an endian argument to scripts/recordmcount.pl Message-ID: <20091120172039.GA6869@linux-mips.org> References: <267c0824194b659b46fc038ba43492df30369fec.1258719323.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <267c0824194b659b46fc038ba43492df30369fec.1258719323.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 25003 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:34:31PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote: > From: Wu Zhangjin > > MIPS and some other architectures need this argument to handle > big/little endian respectively. > > Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin This one is a bit problematic because you seem to have generated the patch against linux-next but I'm applying it on the MIPS -queue tree and some other changes on -next are now resulting in a conflict. And Steven Rostedt is going to merge a few more changes which he says will conflict. So I put this patch on the queue tree but may not propagate it immediately to linux-next. Thanks! Ralf