From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:30:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091121183054.GA3299@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac9c93b10911211007m44955ef9uc99a0e8cf6408339@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@gmx.net>:
> > Hi,
> > indeed, the SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz has changed on
> > http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release,
> > so conf/checksums.ini is outdated, as it stands, and has to be updated:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@gmx.net>
> >
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini
> > index 784a092..e1aac1f 100644
> > --- a/conf/checksums.ini
> > +++ b/conf/checksums.ini
> > @@ -1099,8 +1099,8 @@ md5=0b5b91015d0f3bd9597e094ba67c4d65
> > sha256=a8222a274778ff16d0e3ee49a30db27a48a4d357169a915fc599a764e405e0b6
> >
> > [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz]
> > -md5=a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156
> > -sha256=557910a4a3aeed6d10238e26b5a39b19247115a1b352580082bb15dc02ae4b8d
> > +md5=09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591
> > +sha256=7216a89d92327d2f0fe03e78f3c758a52be68c29daf8e971c226f4a3191e9ec0
> >
> > [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release/SDL_net-1.2.5.tar.gz]
> > md5=e45b1048d2747480dcc65ece4130a920
> >
> > Philip Balister schrieb:
> >>
> >> On 11/21/2009 01:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz' saved [2690766/2690766]
> >>>>
> >>>> NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted:
> >>>> 'a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156' and Got:
> >>>> '09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591'
> >>>
> >>> that second checksum is, in fact, the correct one for that tarball.
> >>> and the sha256sum in conf/checksums.ini also doesn't match the one for
> >>> that tarball. if that used to be correct, does that mean someone has
> >>> replaced a tarball with a different but identically-named one?
>
> Before committing this patch I would suggest comparing the new and the
> old version to find out what is actually causing this and what has
> been changed.
> If we just blindly change checksums we might as well abandon them.
> Also note that a change of the checksum means that everyone who has
> the file in his/her download dir will get a checksum error.
>
> For now a nack from me.
>
> As this already happened before recently (perl twig) I suggest we
> adapt a policy for this or maybe some automated removal (e.g. if you
> have a file in your downloads dir with a checksum in blacklist.ini
> that version is not used but removed or parked aside or something like
> that).
>
> Frans
As Bernhard probably hasn't old archive I tried it here
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9 $ ls -lR > lslR.txt
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9 $ cd ../SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new $ ls -lR > lslR.txt
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new $ cd ..
/home/downloads/OE $ diff -rq SDL_mixer-1.2.9 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
Files SDL_mixer-1.2.9/lslR.txt and SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/lslR.txt differ
/home/downloads/OE $ diff -r SDL_mixer-1.2.9 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
All file rights are the same only dates changed from Oct 13 to Nov 7
So it looks safe.
martin@jama /home/downloads/OE $ md5sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz;
sha256sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
557910a4a3aeed6d10238e26b5a39b19247115a1b352580082bb15dc02ae4b8d
SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
martin@jama /home/downloads/OE $ md5sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz;
sha256sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591 SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
7216a89d92327d2f0fe03e78f3c758a52be68c29daf8e971c226f4a3191e9ec0
SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
Acked-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
--
uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr
JaMa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-21 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-21 5:55 wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9 GNUtoo
2009-11-21 6:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-11-21 14:28 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-21 17:02 ` GNUtoo
2009-11-21 17:45 ` [PATCH] " Bernhard Kaindl
2009-11-21 18:07 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-21 18:24 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-21 18:30 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2009-11-22 9:51 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 10:30 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-22 12:21 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 12:29 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-22 12:55 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 12:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-22 15:56 ` [PATCH] libsdl-mixer: delete libsdl-mixer_1.2.9.bb (as agreed upon) Bernhard Kaindl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091121183054.GA3299@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.