From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com ([209.85.218.217]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCBaI-000347-Lz for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:30:33 +0100 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4228767bwz.12 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:29:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V2B3kE4BgXfcDlf/AmL8nFpKxy/rhYNgtlyvMbzdNqw=; b=PxWUV9/H99xIhCkncDCKeop0Rtam1k8nnQltvbCbZ/ixKCQ6tkZ2GrMz5mXM1Q7+ge 3DcbQFE/rLOv4vEmz/y6nZG5M1hBFz8eTU6K7PcYaKzn+oxItoVeQJYKX58e9Vg/OxCi GmSEfTl6wKbaBnJFAgc2lVnsGMm6LewyIkr0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ur7+XvuAecV+mzhjYbZWbe7LvI6TvaiLcP7MvsfFQVFfs9PO3+/XnLeifOJvmKf9AE wDtE36Ihl8o17IKmJiHwG8hVJRo5vzqFZNu5vs0021sXCHpxBMw401enBfg8HFMZj6mP lignMHDUJlH5jMCeefVBK2820eAyNHcLTmYik= Received: by 10.204.157.24 with SMTP id z24mr3478682bkw.208.1258892943467; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm1066437fxm.4.2009.11.22.04.29.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:29:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:01 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091122122901.GA3349@jama> References: <1258782956.5424.17.camel@gnutoo-desktop> <4B07F8F8.3060802@balister.org> <4B082733.1060504@gmx.net> <20091121183054.GA3299@jama> <20091122103022.GB4400@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.218.217 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:30:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:21:23PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Hm. That would put things in loser++ mode. If files are generated by > the makefile they do not belong in the archive ... > Then again the website says: > > * Fixed alpha premultiplication on Mac OS X and iPhone OS > * Fixed checking for IMG_Init() return value in image loaders Again yes! that's what is written bellow line: SDL_image 1.2.9 has been released with a quick bug fix for Mac OS X and iPhone: So what you just copy&pasted is changelog between SDL_image-1.2.8 and SDL_image-1.2.9, which doesn't say a thing about changed tarball for SDL_mixer. in my universe SDL_image != SDL_mixer, but maybe I live in twisted reality :). > But I agree with Koen, let's move to 1.2.11. Me too > FM Regards, JaMa