All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mbroz@sourceware.org <mbroz@sourceware.org>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/locking/locking.c
Date: 23 Nov 2009 10:55:14 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123105514.5325.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)

CVSROOT:	/cvs/lvm2
Module name:	LVM2
Changes by:	mbroz at sourceware.org	2009-11-23 10:55:14

Modified files:
	.              : WHATS_NEW 
	lib/locking    : locking.c 

Log message:
	Fix memory lock imbalance in locking code.
	
	(This affects only cluster locking because only cluster
	locking module set LCK_PRE_MEMLOCK.)
	
	With currect code you get
	# vgchange -a n
	Internal error: _memlock_count has dropped below 0.
	when using cluster locking.
	
	It is caused by _unlock_memory calls here
	
	if ((flags & (LCK_SCOPE_MASK | LCK_TYPE_MASK)) == LCK_LV_RESUME)
	memlock_dec();
	
	Unfortunately it is also (wrongly) called in immediate unlock
	(when LCK_HOLD is not set) from lock_vol
	(LCK_UNLOCK is misinterpreted as LCK_LV_RESUME).
	
	Avoid this by comparing original flags and provide memlock
	code type of operation (suspend/resume).

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/WHATS_NEW.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.1321&r2=1.1322
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/locking/locking.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.66&r2=1.67

--- LVM2/WHATS_NEW	2009/11/23 10:44:50	1.1321
+++ LVM2/WHATS_NEW	2009/11/23 10:55:14	1.1322
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 Version 2.02.56 - 
 ====================================
+  Fix memory lock imbalance in locking code.
   Revert vg_read_internal change, clvmd cannot use vg_read now. (2.02.55)
 
 Version 2.02.55 - 19th November 2009
--- LVM2/lib/locking/locking.c	2009/09/14 22:47:49	1.66
+++ LVM2/lib/locking/locking.c	2009/11/23 10:55:14	1.67
@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@
 static struct sigaction _oldhandler;
 static int _oldmasked;
 
+typedef enum {
+        LV_NOOP,
+        LV_SUSPEND,
+        LV_RESUME
+} lv_operation_t;
+
 static void _catch_sigint(int unused __attribute__((unused)))
 {
 	_sigint_caught = 1;
@@ -159,21 +165,21 @@
 	return;
 }
 
-static void _lock_memory(uint32_t flags)
+static void _lock_memory(lv_operation_t lv_op)
 {
 	if (!(_locking.flags & LCK_PRE_MEMLOCK))
 		return;
 
-	if ((flags & (LCK_SCOPE_MASK | LCK_TYPE_MASK)) == LCK_LV_SUSPEND)
+	if (lv_op == LV_SUSPEND)
 		memlock_inc();
 }
 
-static void _unlock_memory(uint32_t flags)
+static void _unlock_memory(lv_operation_t lv_op)
 {
 	if (!(_locking.flags & LCK_PRE_MEMLOCK))
 		return;
 
-	if ((flags & (LCK_SCOPE_MASK | LCK_TYPE_MASK)) == LCK_LV_RESUME)
+	if (lv_op == LV_RESUME)
 		memlock_dec();
 }
 
@@ -336,12 +342,13 @@
  * VG locking is by VG name.
  * FIXME This should become VG uuid.
  */
-static int _lock_vol(struct cmd_context *cmd, const char *resource, uint32_t flags)
+static int _lock_vol(struct cmd_context *cmd, const char *resource,
+		     uint32_t flags, lv_operation_t lv_op)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	_block_signals(flags);
-	_lock_memory(flags);
+	_lock_memory(lv_op);
 
 	assert(resource);
 
@@ -368,7 +375,7 @@
 		_update_vg_lock_count(resource, flags);
 	}
 
-	_unlock_memory(flags);
+	_unlock_memory(lv_op);
 	_unblock_signals();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -377,6 +384,18 @@
 int lock_vol(struct cmd_context *cmd, const char *vol, uint32_t flags)
 {
 	char resource[258] __attribute((aligned(8)));
+	lv_operation_t lv_op;
+
+	switch (flags & (LCK_SCOPE_MASK | LCK_TYPE_MASK)) {
+		case LCK_LV_SUSPEND:
+				lv_op = LV_SUSPEND;
+				break;
+		case LCK_LV_RESUME:
+				lv_op = LV_RESUME;
+				break;
+		default:	lv_op = LV_NOOP;
+	}
+
 
 	if (flags == LCK_NONE) {
 		log_debug("Internal error: %s: LCK_NONE lock requested", vol);
@@ -416,7 +435,7 @@
 
 	strncpy(resource, vol, sizeof(resource));
 
-	if (!_lock_vol(cmd, resource, flags))
+	if (!_lock_vol(cmd, resource, flags, lv_op))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -426,7 +445,7 @@
 	if (!(flags & LCK_CACHE) && !(flags & LCK_HOLD) &&
 	    ((flags & LCK_TYPE_MASK) != LCK_UNLOCK)) {
 		if (!_lock_vol(cmd, resource,
-			       (flags & ~LCK_TYPE_MASK) | LCK_UNLOCK))
+			       (flags & ~LCK_TYPE_MASK) | LCK_UNLOCK, lv_op))
 			return 0;
 	}
 



             reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23 10:55 mbroz [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-27 15:53 LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/locking/locking.c mbroz
2011-08-10 16:07 mbroz
2011-01-13 14:56 zkabelac
2010-03-31 17:23 mbroz
2010-01-13 17:40 mbroz
2009-07-14 11:01 agk
2009-02-22 16:13 agk
2008-05-08 18:35 agk
2006-10-14 16:37 agk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091123105514.5325.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=mbroz@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.