From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns0.zlo.nu ([85.17.141.90] helo=mzh.zlo.nu) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCXTb-0005UN-Tb for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:53:07 +0100 Received: by mzh.zlo.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAD4C140B0; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:35 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091123115135.GA26444@zlo.nu> References: <4B068A46.8090701@balister.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.17.141.90 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marcolz@zlo.nu X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upgrade guile from 1.8.6 to 1.8.7. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:53:07 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 14608 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:22:04AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > 2) You can include the checksums in the recipe now. See: > > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/curl/cu= rl_7.19.7.bb > > > > look in the curl-common.inc file for the "tarball" naming. >=20 > ok, there's some curious stuff going on there. first, while the > newest curl .bb file is version 7.19.7, there is no equivalent > curl-native .bb file, even though earlier version have them. is there > a reason for that? Yes, I did not bother to add a -native version of it, because the update (from 7.19.6) did not provide anything new or fixed anything that would be of value to an OE build. ;-) > also, it's only that latest .bb file -- curl_7.19.7.bb -- that has > the tarball checksums. if there *was* a corresponding -native .bb > file, would it *also* need those identical checksums? i would like to > think not since that would be redundant. a grep of recipes shows only > two recipes that appear to be taking advantage of this feature -- > busybox and curl. The -native .bb would include the non-native .bb and thus use the same checksums, which would be correct. Marc --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksKd0cACgkQezjnobFOgrF01ACfQ5PFIoYeO9qbs7u3bTngaqQq GjQAn1sObEmNurXLZ4UxOwuC0IonJ0jq =n+3t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--