From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:11:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123131113.GE24326@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123122903.GB3616@sortiz.org>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:29:04PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> True. Mark, I think we should get those symbols exported, unless you have a
> better idea ? Having wm831x as a boolean choice from Kconfig doesnt sound too
> god to me.
I don't see getting them exported flying, especially not in the
timeframe we've got for the merge window. Keeping them non-exported has
been a deliberate decision on the part of the genirq maintainers. I'll
send a patch making it built in.
Given the typical applications for these parts building the driver in
isn't the end of the world - there's a reasonable chance it'll be forced
built in for other reasons due to device-specific configuration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 3:41 linux-next: mfd tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:29 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 13:11 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2009-11-23 14:44 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 15:20 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-19 4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-19 10:59 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-19 11:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 12:02 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-11 12:33 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-11 22:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 9:57 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-24 10:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 10:40 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 3:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 16:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-11-24 23:35 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-10-06 2:02 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06 2:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-06 2:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-06 3:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06 4:19 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-08 5:59 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-08 5:59 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-12 2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 10:07 ` Balaji Rao
2009-01-13 6:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-14 12:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 14:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 15:39 ` ian
2008-08-05 16:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-05 18:50 ` ian
2008-08-05 16:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 16:08 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 16:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 17:40 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 18:46 ` ian
2008-08-06 9:53 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-06 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 5:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 13:03 ` ian
2008-08-05 13:09 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 13:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 15:29 ` ian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091123131113.GE24326@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.