All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: cleanup unreachable code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:36:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124193638.GA2803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911241701.49677.czoccolo@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:01:49PM +0100, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> cfq_should_idle returns false for no-idle queues that are not the last,
> so the control flow will never reach the removed code in a state that
> satisfies the if condition.
> The unreachable code was added to emulate previous cfq behaviour for
> non-NCQ rotational devices. My tests show that even without it, the
> performances and fairness are comparable with previous cfq, thanks to
> the fact that all seeky queues are grouped together, and that we idle at
> the end of the tree.
> 

As you said that right now it is dead code, so better remove it.

Theoretically, by retaining this code we could benefit on non NCQ
rotational media if seek cost across the sync-noidle queues is higher
as compared to seek cost with-in queue. Fix it if we run into it.

Till then better to remove dead code.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Thanks
Vivek

> Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  block/cfq-iosched.c |   13 -------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index d44f8a4..7144649 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -1274,19 +1274,6 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
>  	cfq_mark_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq);
>  
>  	sl = cfqd->cfq_slice_idle;
> -	/* are we servicing noidle tree, and there are more queues?
> -	 * non-rotational or NCQ: no idle
> -	 * non-NCQ rotational : very small idle, to allow
> -	 *     fair distribution of slice time for a process doing back-to-back
> -	 *     seeks.
> -	 */
> -	if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
> -	    service_tree_for(cfqd->serving_prio, SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD, cfqd)
> -		->count > 0) {
> -		if (blk_queue_nonrot(cfqd->queue) || cfqd->hw_tag)
> -			return;
> -		sl = min(sl, msecs_to_jiffies(CFQ_MIN_TT));
> -	}
>  
>  	mod_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer, jiffies + sl);
>  	cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "arm_idle: %lu", sl);
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-24 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-24 16:01 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: cleanup unreachable code Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-24 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-11-26  8:42 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091124193638.GA2803@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.