All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 07/14] ptrace: x86: change syscall_trace_leave() to rely on tracehook when stepping
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:01:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124200152.GA5789@redhat.com> (raw)

(already in mm: ptrace-x86-change-syscall_trace_leave-to-rely-on-tracehook-when-stepping.patch)

Suggested by Roland.

Unlike powepc, x86 always calls tracehook_report_syscall_exit(step)
with step = 0, and sends the trap by hand.

This results in unnecessary SIGTRAP when PTRACE_SINGLESTEP follows
the syscall-exit stop.

Change syscall_trace_leave() to pass the correct "step" argument to
tracehook and remove the send_sigtrap() logic.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---

 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c |   21 +++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- V1/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c~7_X86_CONVERT_SYSCALL_LEAVE	2009-11-24 19:52:11.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c	2009-11-24 19:52:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1528,29 +1528,22 @@ asmregparm long syscall_trace_enter(stru
 
 asmregparm void syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	bool step;
+
 	if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
 		audit_syscall_exit(AUDITSC_RESULT(regs->ax), regs->ax);
 
 	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
 		trace_sys_exit(regs, regs->ax);
 
-	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
-		tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
-
 	/*
 	 * If TIF_SYSCALL_EMU is set, we only get here because of
 	 * TIF_SINGLESTEP (i.e. this is PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP).
 	 * We already reported this syscall instruction in
-	 * syscall_trace_enter(), so don't do any more now.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)))
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * If we are single-stepping, synthesize a trap to follow the
-	 * system call instruction.
+	 * syscall_trace_enter().
 	 */
-	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP) &&
-	    tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
-		send_sigtrap(current, regs, 0, TRAP_BRKPT);
+	step = unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) &&
+			!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU);
+	if (step || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
+		tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, step);
 }


                 reply	other threads:[~2009-11-24 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091124200152.GA5789@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.