From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Alexandros Batsakis <batsakis@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124203923.GA29856@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0C2FA2.8000207@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone ever going to use NFSv4.1 over UDP?
> >
>
> I thought that NFSv4 over UDP was outlawed because UDP, as
> a transport, did not offer the correct set of semantics
> required. I know that the Linux NFSv4 server registers
> NFSv4 over UDP, but I don't know of any other servers which
> do.
>
> I was going to file a bug and a patch to stop NFSv4 from
> being transported over UDP. :-)
OK by me.--b.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 21:54 [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfs41: add support for callback with RPC version number 4 Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfs41: fix cb_recall bug Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] nfs4: minor delegation cleaning Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs4: return/expire delegations depending on their type Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] nfs41: initial support for CB_RECALL_ANY Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] nfs41: check if session exists and if it is persistent Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] nfs41: add support for the exclusive create flags Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] nfs41: remove server-only EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R flag from exchange_id Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] nfs41: check SEQUENCE status flag Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 23:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs4: return/expire delegations depending on their type Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 23:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfs41: fix cb_recall bug Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 22:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize Peter Staubach
2009-11-23 22:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 23:14 ` Batsakis, Alexandros
2009-11-24 19:10 ` Peter Staubach
2009-11-24 20:39 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124203923.GA29856@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=batsakis@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.