All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wouter van Heyst <larstiq@larstiq.dyndns.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	504391@bugs.debian.org, Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed removable
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:57:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091201195747.GA4861@one.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258893136.3627.10.camel@localhost>

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:32:16PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:42 +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:

...

> > I'm running 2.6.32-rc7 with this patch applied and CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y
> > That works as desired for my non-removable case. Is it desired that I
> > test if 'removable=1' will thrash my filesystem?
> 
> Please test with CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=n (which Debian will continue
> to use) and removable=0.

It took a while to get around to it correctly, but yes this works.
Without setting removable=0 my Acer Aspire One hangs while trying to
resume if the mmc card is mounted.

Wouter van Heyst

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11  4:44 [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed removable Ben Hutchings
2009-11-16 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-16 22:31   ` Ben Hutchings
2009-11-17  7:53     ` Stefan Richter
2009-11-30 12:39       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-11-30 12:54         ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 13:09           ` Pierre Ossman
2009-11-30 13:32         ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-30 13:51           ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 15:27             ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-22 11:42     ` Bug#504391: " Wouter van Heyst
2009-11-22 11:42       ` Wouter van Heyst
2009-11-22 12:32       ` Ben Hutchings
2009-12-01 19:57         ` Wouter van Heyst [this message]
2009-11-30 12:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-11-30 12:48   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091201195747.GA4861@one.lan \
    --to=larstiq@larstiq.dyndns.org \
    --cc=504391@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.