From: sebastien dugue <sebastien.dugue-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
To: kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org
Cc: Vincent Ficet <jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
BOURDE CELINE <Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ?
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:08:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091203100807.37f259b2@frecb007965> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B177F10.1040908-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:04:16 +0200
Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> sebastien dugue wrote:
> > Hi Yevgeny,
> >
> > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:01:28 +0200
> > Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Sebastien,
> >>
> >> I noticed that you found the problem in IPoIB child
> >> interfaces configuration. Glad that this worked out well.
> >>
> >> My question is about the note that you left in the issue:
> >>
> >> " It looks like in 'datagram' mode, the SL weights
> >> do not seem to be applied, or maybe this is an
> >> artifact of IPoIB in 'datagram mode' "
> >>
> >> Have you checked that in this mode you do get the right
> >> SL for each child interface by shutting off the relevant
> >> SL (mapping it to VL15)?
> >
> > Yes, SL to VL mapping is OK.
> >
> >> If yes, then what you're saying is that you see that
> >> interfaces use the right SL and VL, but you don't see
> >> any arbitration between VLs?
> >
> > Right, whatever the weights I put in the vlarbs tables have absolutely
> > no effect when IPoIB is in datagram mode. I don't know if it's
> > an arbitration problem (don't think so) or an IPoIB problem.
> >
> > Could be that due to the 2044 bytes MTU in datagram mode, iperf
> > spends much time not doing transfers and fails to provide enough
> > data to the interfaces. Don't know.
> >
> > Once I switched to connected mode, with a 65520 bytes MTU, things
> > started to work OK with a much better overall combined bandwidth.
>
> OK, then "a much better overall combined bandwidth" is an
> answer here. VL arbitration kicks in only when you saturate
> the link. If you don't, there's no point doing arbitration,
> because HW is able so serve any packet that comes w/o the
> need to prioritize.
Yep, that's the conclusion I came to.
Might be interesting to find where the bottleneck is though, that
prevents saturating the link.
Sébastien.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 10:57 QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ? Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D0DB2.6080802-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 12:12 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D1F36.1090007-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:01 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D38C7.3080505-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:37 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D410E.2010903-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:14 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D49F0.6060400-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:45 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D5110.70606-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 7:57 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E34EB.6020403-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E3B63.40705-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:49 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E4105.5080107-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 9:56 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E50D6.8020401-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:01 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177058.9070909-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:17 ` sebastien dugue
2009-12-03 9:04 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177F10.1040908-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:08 ` sebastien dugue [this message]
2009-12-03 8:21 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <4B1774F0.9060002-hKgKHo2Ms0FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:05 ` sebastien dugue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091203100807.37f259b2@frecb007965 \
--to=sebastien.dugue-6ktuutfb/bm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.