From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAMV-0003Yp-RG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAMO-0003WL-9r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44981 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAMN-0003Vs-RN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6589) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGAMN-0006gE-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:57:29 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] in-kernel irqchip, new spin Message-ID: <20091203115729.GC7352@redhat.com> References: <1259761575-3953-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20091203102701.GC6752@redhat.com> <5d6222a80912030342m499eb913lff5fc7a21b142718@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80912030342m499eb913lff5fc7a21b142718@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Glauber Costa , avi@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:42:02AM -0200, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > > Does msix work with this patchset when in-kernel irqchip > > is enabled? > > Haven't tested. But since I see that msix need some special code in qemu-kvm, > it probably won't. But I assume we can just add a patch ontop of this to add > that code and make it work, right? Sure. However - are you making in-kernel irqchip the default? If so, I think the best way to do it would be: 1. add in-kernel irqchip, off by default 2. fix msix with in-kernel 3. make in-kernel on by default Otherwise you hurt bisectability. > -- > Glauber Costa. > "Free as in Freedom" > http://glommer.net > > "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."