From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What Is AUDITD_DISABLE_CONTEXTS?
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:05:17 -0500
Message-ID: <200912081005.17212.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <FFA9EB335368E0429E5DE3C20D81B4959F6867A62E@JTCLPSMAIL02.lpsvcs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <FFA9EB335368E0429E5DE3C20D81B4959F6867A62E@JTCLPSMAIL02.lpsvcs.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: "Wyllie, Aaron" <Aaron.Wyllie@lpsvcs.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 08 December 2009 09:38:30 am Wyllie, Aaron wrote:
> Is this a SLED-thing only?

Doesn't ring a bell, so I guess so.

> Was it ever part of the default auditd?  

Nope.

> Is it safe to ignore this?

On a RHEL machine, yes.

> If it can be ignored, what functionality superseded
>  it or delivered the same results in the first place?

No idea what it was.

-Steve