From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com ([209.85.218.217]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NHyzj-0005gR-Ih for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:16:46 +0100 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4249410bwz.12 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:15:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jYDMWKEfnXY6RwiAdmw+NGL70ArsgrH6pw0X4ALTWsk=; b=UR3vjO6RrNLElXDMD85kmxluzUXIgrgWdGUlvFa13ESmhZddpv95598oqZ3DYoK8T0 NHG7URU+U7cQnyUod32t/HbTOta35cympEGlmN4pn0xRWfq56l3EMe2ehUzmdNZ/xuT4 ge0hUNlwgZD7nvGK41PGHoZjyWtsNokwCRvC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=tIB0Isb5hnx4RSm4XJP1LBziwmEPDQ4WL3UY0MfZk3JY04wbgF83PGS2JhRxJwE4OK QWX9Q1Otgpa1om4dsZNaSh4kd3Is86VSOPnJHg/opro3Ef6t7BuvgWPiyCM2Hx0ElgH+ AczexxEkQowYfFJ3+EPnuEojHsYa8u0QLAjXw= Received: by 10.204.7.87 with SMTP id c23mr3656593bkc.97.1260274502563; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm2328246fxm.0.2009.12.08.04.15.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:15:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:15:10 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20091208121510.GE3803@jama> References: <1260221130-4958-1-git-send-email-sgh@sgh.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.218.217 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unset DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for mesa-dri-7.2 and mesa-dri-7.4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:16:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:05:40AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > What's the rationale behind this change? And why do you comment it > when we have an scm that can track changes? > > regards, > > Koen I had similar problem in xorg-7.5 branch. Few packages depending on "mesa" directly, I replaced all with virtual/libgl which is probably provided by all mesa variants (normal, -full, -dri, -xlib). Then we can use normal preference in all mesa recipes and select right variant with PREFERRED_PROVIDER in machine config, right? Can I merge those patches for depends on virtual/libgl? Whole mesa directory seems quite messy to me.. 4 generations of mesa recipes with own include files, 4 variants with not so bigg diff. But my mesa knowledge wrt all oe devices isn't strong enough to encourage me to cleanup it a bit (I'm glad that mesa-dri-7.6 works good with spitz and for om-gta02 we use mesa-dri_git with special glamo DRI patches from Thomas White's branch). -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa