From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com ([209.85.220.216]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NJQSD-0003Oa-DB for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:48:08 +0100 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so2017737fxm.27 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:46:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8y++GEHIicsvHD4GwOQWH/b64D3YkwDIp7kyHonNNXw=; b=LOVI2MIaSnmfIl+7aIOQqfCwf2HMz4tJ7VptYKVg6bjWj75Xn+7on9u9nskx/XWiQn Gs+3TILs0NXtuxg1722eE2xHvq588NUbx/5SvceNHHlUgPJRIgBe/sB2L3KqTKThPxUi lrcLvNGkaGfIkxuca4nTivEdXU4e6NGEmgfLE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=AmVX0dFIWmn+4bl3PHwnUSEx0ksS2vNSK9xOm5NkQT5CMuZM5rYF8Ql7/aEsVxt73Z uWtzJfFDvGROgbJsa1KRNUeq3JDu1S91MK9DMH3dik8faDL0BopX39oodMLJYoBM80C+ yqDwbYxVtd3QqhAIUHK9zH/tftrgEKIYYLrXI= Received: by 10.223.17.65 with SMTP id r1mr2924757faa.5.1260618381996; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-241-136.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.241.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2sm4258951fkh.32.2009.12.12.03.46.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:46:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NJQTd-0005CQ-SM; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:49:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:49:33 +0100 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20091212114933.GA8391@mx.loc> References: <1260393869-8231-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <19c1b8a90912092039w592aed8btf658721b77f8e646@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19c1b8a90912092039w592aed8btf658721b77f8e646@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.216 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binutils-2.20: remove unneeded/unwanted patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:48:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:39:20PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> Hi khem, >> >> In 33630af91d1027a91b43f697c86e809a770668e1 you (AFAICS) added >> binutils-2.20 support, yet the hunks mentioned below were already >> applied or are unneeded in that release?! How did you patch/compile >> this, perhaps i'm missing some crucial part in the setup? >> Thanks for clarification/fixing this up, > >out of these three only patch which is applied right now is >binutils-arm-pr7093.patch and by nature of the patch it adds a check >and returns if true. Now that the patch it applied twice the check is done twice >making one redundant but not incorrect. Just existence of patch does not apply >them automatically you have to add the patches to SRC_URI in order to include >them. I'm aware of this, yes. But the fact that you pulled them into the 2.20 patchdir suggested that they were somehow still of interrest for that version, although not applied. > >I will remove these patches from repo as they are not applied. Thanks alot for removing them, they're just taking up space and bandwidth. cheers,