From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NJnp5-0007o0-EO for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:45:15 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJnp2-0007mv-QF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:45:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJnoy-0007lW-Br for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:45:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53294 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJnoy-0007lA-57 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:45:08 -0500 Received: from 197.red-80-32-81.staticip.rima-tde.net ([80.32.81.197]:38089 helo=mail.pina.cat) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJnox-0007tH-NE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:45:08 -0500 Received: from pinux (82-45-164-87.cable.ubr06.hari.blueyonder.co.uk [82.45.164.87]) by mail.pina.cat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CBE288F2FE7 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:45:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by pinux (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44A7069A8; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:45:22 +0000 From: Carles Pina i Estany To: The development of GNU GRUB Message-ID: <20091213124522.GA17683@pina.cat> References: <20091129183936.GB19323@pina.cat> <20091204212100.GK1528@thorin> <20091204215558.GA13421@pina.cat> <20091212000451.GB13597@pina.cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091212000451.GB13597@pina.cat> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: var=foo should be valid? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:45:13 -0000 Hi, On Dec/12/2009, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > We should fix it. We have three options (maintaining the current > behaviour for the user): > > > a) simple_patch (just swapping that two lines) After talking with Robert last night and for the time being I've committed the simple one (r1933) to fix the current bug. -- Carles Pina i Estany http://pinux.info