From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:43:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091215174302.GA3928@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091214220320.665065925@quilx.com>
* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> Leftovers from the earlier patchset. Mostly applications of per cpu counters
> to core components.
>
> After this patchset there will be only one user of local_t left: Mathieu's
> trace ringbuffer. Does it really need these ops?
>
Besides my own ring buffer implementation in LTTng, at least Steven's
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c (in mainline) use this too. We would need a
way to directly map to the same resulting behavior with per-cpu
variables.
In LTTng, I use local_cmpxchg, local_read, local_add and, in some
setups, local_add_return to manage the write counter and commit
counters. These per-cpu counters are kept in per-cpu buffer management
data allocated for each data collection "channel".
The current way I allocate this structure for all cpus is:
chan->buf = alloc_percpu(struct ltt_chanbuf);
But note that each struct ltt_chanbuf contains a pointer to an array
containing each sub-buffer commit counters for the given buffer:
struct commit_counters {
local_t cc;
local_t cc_sb; /* Incremented _once_ at sb switch */
local_t events; /* Event count */
};
struct ltt_chanbuf {
struct ltt_chanbuf_alloc a; /* Parent. First field. */
/* First 32 bytes cache-hot cacheline */
local_t offset; /* Current offset in the buffer */
struct commit_counters *commit_count;
/* Commit count per sub-buffer */
atomic_long_t consumed; /*
* Current offset in the buffer
* standard atomic access (shared)
*/
....
So I think accessing the "local_t offset" through percpu pointers should
be fine if I allocate struct ltt_chanbuf through the per cpu API.
However, I wonder how to deal with the commit_count counters, because
there is an indirection level.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-14 22:03 [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 3:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 15:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 0:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 2/8] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 3/8] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 4/8] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 5/8] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 6:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-15 14:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 14:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 4:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 22:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 5:42 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 8/8] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 4:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 6:37 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Pekka Enberg
2009-12-15 6:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 14:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-12-16 14:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 21:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-12-16 0:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 1:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16 1:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 13:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 20:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 0:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-18 0:27 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091215174302.GA3928@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.