From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] sched: Fix select_task_rq() vs hotplug issues
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:04:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216170517.961475466@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091216170430.073353839@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: foo8.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3519 bytes --]
Since select_task_rq() is now responsible for guaranteeing
->cpus_allowed and cpu_active_mask, we need to verify this.
select_task_rq_rt() can blindly return smp_processor_id()/task_cpu()
without checking the valid masks, select_task_rq_fair() can do the
same in the rare case that all SD_flags are disabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2317,6 +2317,43 @@ void task_oncpu_function_call(struct tas
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ int dest_cpu;
+ const struct cpumask *nodemask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
+
+ /* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
+ for_each_cpu_and(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_active_mask)
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed))
+ return dest_cpu;
+
+ /* Any allowed, online CPU? */
+ dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
+ if (dest_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ return dest_cpu;
+
+ /* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
+ if (dest_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p, &p->cpus_allowed);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, &p->cpus_allowed);
+
+ /*
+ * Don't tell them about moving exiting tasks or
+ * kernel threads (both mm NULL), since they never
+ * leave kernel.
+ */
+ if (p->mm && printk_ratelimit()) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "process %d (%s) no "
+ "longer affine to cpu%d\n",
+ task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, cpu);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return dest_cpu;
+}
+
/*
* Called from:
*
@@ -2343,14 +2380,8 @@ int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p
* not worry about this generic constraint ]
*/
if (unlikely(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) ||
- !cpu_active(cpu))) {
-
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
- /*
- * XXX: race against hot-plug modifying cpu_active_mask
- */
- BUG_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
- }
+ !cpu_active(cpu)))
+ cpu = select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p);
return cpu;
}
@@ -7319,36 +7350,10 @@ static int __migrate_task_irq(struct tas
static void move_task_off_dead_cpu(int dead_cpu, struct task_struct *p)
{
int dest_cpu;
- const struct cpumask *nodemask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(dead_cpu));
again:
- /* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
- for_each_cpu_and(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_active_mask)
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed))
- goto move;
-
- /* Any allowed, online CPU? */
- dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
- if (dest_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
- goto move;
-
- /* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
- if (dest_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
- cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p, &p->cpus_allowed);
- dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, &p->cpus_allowed);
-
- /*
- * Don't tell them about moving exiting tasks or
- * kernel threads (both mm NULL), since they never
- * leave kernel.
- */
- if (p->mm && printk_ratelimit()) {
- pr_info("process %d (%s) no longer affine to cpu%d\n",
- task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, dead_cpu);
- }
- }
+ dest_cpu = select_fallback_rq(dead_cpu, p);
-move:
/* It can have affinity changed while we were choosing. */
if (unlikely(!__migrate_task_irq(p, dead_cpu, dest_cpu)))
goto again;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-16 17:04 [PATCH 00/12] sched: cleanup set_task_cpu() issues Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched: Mark boot-cpu active before smp_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:36 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched: Fix set_cpu_active() in cpu_down() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:36 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched: Fix task_hot() test order Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched: select_task_rq_fair() must honour SD_LOAD_BALANCE Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Select_task_rq_fair() " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched: Use TASK_WAKING for fork wakups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched: Ensure set_task_cpu() is never called on blocked tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 5:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Make warning less noisy tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched: Fix sched_exec() balancing Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix select_task_rq() vs hotplug issues tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched: Move kthread_bind() back to kthread.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched: Add pre and post wakeup hooks Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched: Remove the cfs_rq dependency from set_task_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 12/12] sched: Simplify set_task_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 21:17 ` [PATCH 13/12] sched: remove debug check Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216170517.961475466@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.