Re: [PATCH 3/3] misc: use a proper range for minor number dynamic allocation

[David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:37:38PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I merged this patch, but made a note-to-self that there are remaining
> > > open issues..
> > 
> > And nothing else happened.  Can we revisit this please?
> 
> The last I saw was a request for an explanation of the users
> configuration and how he was getting so many misc devices. Its a bug in
> dlm if the dlm is doing that but I didn't see any follow up to the DLM
> folks on the subject from the reporter, so it stays NACKed and conflicts
> with the device registry.

I never saw an indication that the dlm ate up all of someone's misc
devices.  Can we ask the reporter what they were running?

> We need to know from the DLM folks/Thaddeu what is actually going on with
> that system, especially as it seems to be producing multiple
> registrations of the same misc device name which is completely broken and
> should probably be made to error anyway.

I don't believe the dlm will ever register multiple devices with the same
name.

> Whatever is going on this is the wrong "fix". If DLM should only register
> it once (as seems the intent) then DLM needs fixing or the users config
> or both. If it can register many then DLM needs fixing to not eat misc
> devices.

I explained here http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/9/379 that the dlm does not
use as many misc devices as has been implied.  It starts with 3, and adds
one for each *userspace* lockspace.  There are very few applications (I
know of 3) that create userspace lockspaces, and they each create about
one each.

That said, I still intend to rework the dlm to use a single device for all
lockspaces.

Dave