From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: link to toggle 'no merges' option
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912172214.27001.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb7bb73a0912171241j56ecd2f1y3dc66cf3b86bd784@mail.gmail.com>
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> 2009/12/17 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:05 +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
[...]
>>> + my $can_have_merges = grep(/^$action$/, @{$allowed_options{'--no-merges'}});
>>> + my $has_merges = !grep(/^--no-merges$/, @extra_options);
>>> +
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to use straight
>>
>> + my $no_merges = grep(/^--no-merges$/, @extra_options);
>>
>> Because $has_merges is true also for example for 'tree' view... which
>> absolutely doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
>
> The reason why I have two vars is that one checks if we care about the
> option, and the other is to see if it's enabled or not. We don't want
> the 'show merges' toggle to appear in view which don't handle the
> --no-merge option.
Perhaps I didn't made myself clear.
What I wanted to ask is to switch $has_merges to $no_merges, not to remove
$can_have_merges. Its a question of semantics of $has_merges, which do not
mean that action has (handles) merges.
This is of course the question of style, but I think this would make code
more maintainable.
Of course if you go %extra_options hash route this issue wouldn't matter.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 9:05 [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: link to toggle 'no merges' option Giuseppe Bilotta
2009-12-17 13:03 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-12-17 15:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-17 20:41 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2009-12-17 21:14 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912172214.27001.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.