From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with vhost-net Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20091217224154.GA3769@ami.dom.local> References: <20091217112754.GA7755@ff.dom.local> <20091217114535.GA30429@gondor.apana.org.au> <20091217114937.GA30503@gondor.apana.org.au> <20091217120856.GA30774@gondor.apana.org.au> <20091217134408.GB31964@gondor.apana.org.au> <20091217143635.GA388@gondor.apana.org.au> <1261086608.26700.149.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <1261088890.26700.158.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , Krishna Kumar2 , "David S. Miller" , mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell To: Sridhar Samudrala Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:46322 "EHLO mail-fx0-f221.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936748AbZLQWm0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:42:26 -0500 Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so2368484fxm.21 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:42:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1261088890.26700.158.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:28:10PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > Another interesting observation that Jarek pointed out is that if we drop skb's, i guess > it is causing TCP to backoff and enabling TCP GSO code to send much larger packets(64K > compared to 16K). So although the throughput is higher, packets/sec is less in that > case. Maybe you're right, but there would be useful to have TCP-independent tests to compare, or at least without such impact, so with GSO disabled. Jarek P.