From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14837] New: gretap does not fragment IP packets Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:47:00 -0800 Message-ID: <20091218154700.623f6779@nehalam> References: <20091218153209.45042a58.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, benoit.papillault@free.fr, Jamal Hadi Salim To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:52514 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753244AbZLRXrW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:47:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091218153209.45042a58.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:32:09 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > The expected behavior would be that the encapsulated packet be fragmented. The > > observed behavior is that any encapsulated packets over 1500 bytes are simply > > dropped and an ICMP "fragmentation needed" message is sent to ... who knows. > > > > My feeling is that DF bit is not playing nice here. > > TCP uses DF bit to do path mtu discovery. If your firewall et all, doesn't do ICMP correctly, then this is the classic TCP path MTU discovery ICMP blackhole problem. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2923.txt