From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jbeulich@novell.com, rguenther@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:13:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912221014.02545.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> No, it's solving the same problem, generically. There are numerous places
> where we want to use BUILD_BUG_ON() but we don't have a constant expression.
> Look for MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON().
Ok so you're saying that should be just a MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON()?
>
> Subject: BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
> at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a
> nicer compile time error), then (in
> 8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield.
>
> bitfields: needs a literal constant at parse time, and can't be put under
> "if (__builtin_constant_p(x))" for example.
> negative array: can handle anything, but if the compiler can't tell it's
> a constant, silently has no effect.
> link time: breaks link if the compiler can't determine the value, but the
> linker output is not usually as informative as a compiler error.
>
> If we use the negative-array-size method *and* the link time trick,
> we get the ability to use BUILD_BUG_ON() under __builtin_constant_p()
> branches, and maximal ability for the compiler to detect errors at
> build time.
Ok maybe that works, but we need a fix for 2.6.33 too.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 16:53 [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 10:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-21 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-22 0:13 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-12-21 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.