From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Dynamic device.map
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:18:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091224211827.GH12122@thorin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091210081252.GI6439@riva.ucam.org>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:12:52AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 01:55:27AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:04:43PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I'm trying to figure out how to make Debian's grub-installer operate
> > > without a device.map; it has various legacy bits and pieces that need
> > > conversion, and I'm working on these.
> > >
> > > Along the way, though, I noticed that grub-install still unconditionally
> > > creates a device.map. This seems likely to become confusing if devices
> > > are changing around a lot, since it's never updated. I'd like to get to
> > > the point where it doesn't do this by default. How about we add support
> > > for an option to disable this, and make grub-installer and the Debian
> > > maintainer scripts pass it once they're ready? Some time later, we can
> > > flip the default value.
> >
> > Why is this option necessary? If we removed automated generation of
> > device.map, user can still call grub-mkdevicemap manually.
>
> Certainly, but I would like to be able to deliver a system that does not
> generate a device.map by default.
We don't need a new option for that. We'd just not generate device.map at
all, and provide grub-mkdevicemap for users who want to mess with it.
> No, I don't think we will. grub-probe is perfectly capable of mapping
> /dev/sda1 to (hd0,1) even without device.map;
I wasn't very fond of this because it's BIOS-specific. But I guess we can
live with it.
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-24 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 14:28 [RFC] Dynamic device.map Colin Watson
2009-12-07 17:25 ` Colin Watson
2009-12-09 21:49 ` Robert Millan
2009-12-09 23:04 ` Colin Watson
2009-12-10 0:55 ` Robert Millan
2009-12-10 8:12 ` Colin Watson
2009-12-24 21:18 ` Robert Millan [this message]
2009-12-26 13:25 ` Robert Millan
2009-12-26 21:37 ` David Miller
2009-12-26 22:01 ` Robert Millan
2010-01-06 16:00 ` Colin Watson
2010-01-07 21:30 ` Robert Millan
2010-01-07 22:18 ` Bruce Dubbs
2010-01-07 22:33 ` Colin Watson
2010-01-08 5:27 ` Bruce Dubbs
2010-01-08 10:02 ` Felix Zielcke
2010-01-08 16:36 ` Bruce Dubbs
2009-12-10 10:12 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-12-24 21:17 ` Robert Millan
2009-12-25 17:02 ` Felix Zielcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091224211827.GH12122@thorin \
--to=rmh@aybabtu.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.