From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] convert slotslock to SRCU v2
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:25:00 -0200
Message-ID: <20091225122500.GA4693@amt.cnet>
References: <20091223163515.215618069@redhat.com> <4B3326A0.4080708@redhat.com> <20091224145638.GC5691@redhat.com> <200912251524.49261.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49904 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755339AbZLYPlz (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:41:55 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200912251524.49261.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:24:49PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Thursday 24 December 2009 22:56:38 Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:30:24AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 12/23/2009 06:35 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > >Addressing comments.
> > >
> > > Looks good.
> > 
> > Looks good to me too.
> 
> One small comment on the naming:
> 
> kvm->memslots->memslots[i]
> kvm->aliases->aliases[i]
> 
> Doesn't look good...

Hi Sheng,

Yes its somewhat confusing but i could not come up with 
anything better. Suggestions?