From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:16:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:16:44 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20091230141644.GA8764@fancy-poultry.org> References: <4B3914FB.7060008@gmail.com> <20091228212038.GB2224@maude.comedia.it> <4B3925F0.4050409@gmail.com> <20091228231158.GB16466@fancy-poultry.org> <20091229202429.GB17029@tansi.org> <20091229211536.GA31271@fancy-poultry.org> <20091230025223.GA20576@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091230025223.GA20576@tansi.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] encrypted root: prevent / detect tampering with kernel / initrd List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 30.12.2009, Arno Wagner wrote: > "total security" is a meaningless concept, unless you design and > manufacture all hardware components yourself, which in practce > means it is a meaningless concept. Yes, that was a bad choice of words, I realised it directly after sending the mail to the list. s/total security/max possible security under given circumstances/;