From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need queue merging
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:45:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091230184535.GE4489@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262175004-2132-1-git-send-email-czoccolo@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 30 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> Non rotational devices' performances are not affected by
> distance of requests, so there is no point in having overhead
> to merge queues of nearby requests.
If the distance is zero, it may still make a big difference (at least
for writes). This check would be better as "ncq and doesn't suck", ala
blk_queue_nonrot(q) && tagged
like we do elsewhere.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-30 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-30 12:10 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need queue merging Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 18:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-12-30 20:31 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 21:21 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 21:34 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 22:22 ` [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need read " Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 14:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 16:36 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 16:51 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-04 18:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 18:37 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 18:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 19:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-04 20:37 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-05 14:58 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-05 15:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-05 21:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-05 21:48 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 10:56 ` Kirill Afonshin
2010-01-07 13:38 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-07 17:00 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 18:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-07 20:16 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-08 18:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-10 12:55 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-10 21:04 ` [PATCH] cfq-iosched: NCQ SSDs " Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-10 21:08 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 11:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-11 12:26 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 13:13 ` Jens Axboe
2010-01-11 13:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-11 13:24 ` Jens Axboe
2010-01-11 14:53 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 16:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 17:00 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 17:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 19:05 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 17:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 19:09 ` Corrado Zoccolo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091230184535.GE4489@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.