From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:42:43 -0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] 40TB RAID and OCFS2 woes (inode64, JDB2, huge partition support, Volume might try to write to blocks beyond what jbd can address in 32 bits) In-Reply-To: <1D016AC1-13F8-4433-9E1D-6540302C0373@wansecurity.com> References: <9A9AABD3-F67F-46D3-B08C-4FD89CA16149@wansecurity.com> <20091230203426.GA7272@mail.oracle.com> <1D016AC1-13F8-4433-9E1D-6540302C0373@wansecurity.com> Message-ID: <20091231034243.GA2560@mail.oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 07:25:37AM +0900, Robert Smith wrote: > Dear Joel, I am using a custom compiled kernel version 2.6.32.2, using the stock ubuntu 9.10 server-config for the kernel config. Hmm... > root at s2-replay01:~# grep OCFS2 /usr/src/linux-2.6.32.2/.config > CONFIG_OCFS2_FS=m > CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_O2CB=m > CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_USERSPACE_CLUSTER=m > CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_STATS=y > CONFIG_OCFS2_DEBUG_MASKLOG=y > # CONFIG_OCFS2_DEBUG_FS is not set > CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > root at s2-replay01:~# > > root at s2-replay01:~# grep -i ocfs /proc/filesystems > nodev ocfs2_dlmfs > ocfs2 What do you get from 'modinfo ocfs2'? You should see jbd2 as a dependency. If ocfs2 is loaded, jbd2 should be as well. Sunil is right, 2.6.32 shouldn't have it any other way. Let's check on your filesystem itself. How about the output of 'tunefs.ocfs2 -Q "%M %H %O\n" /dev/replays/replay-data'? That should include strict-journal-super. Then check 'debugfs.ocfs2 -R "logdump 0" /dev/replays/replay-data'. We're looking for "Incompat: 0x2". That means 64bit journals. Joel -- "And yet I fight, And yet I fight this battle all alone. No one to cry to; No place to call home." Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127