From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Prevent from BITS_PER_LONG redefinition
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100102170151.GB5076@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B3C8677.3030606@goop.org>
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:09:43PM +1100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 08:45 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> You can use if() with a constant expression instead of #if.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I did not write this code. But yes you're right, although I
>> think CPP is more suitable here because fls() can be called
>> from fastpath and this conditional build makes one check less
>> and lesser i-cache footprint.
>>
>
> Constant if()s are removed at compile time, so there should be no
> runtime overhead. Constant if()s are generally preferable to #if
> because the compile will statically check the other code branch, even if
> it never gets executed, which helps prevent it from rotting.
Good point! I did not think about compile time optimizations.
I'll try that then. Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-02 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 22:05 [PATCH] perf tools: Prevent from BITS_PER_LONG redefinition Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-19 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-19 14:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-20 5:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-12-30 21:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 11:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-01-02 17:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100102170151.GB5076@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.