All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
To: Hans Werner <HWerner4@gmx.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, mmalygin@ked.de,
	hancockrwd@gmail.com, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: Samsung N130 ATA exception after 5min uptime -- Phoenix FailSafe issue?
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:11:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100103221142.GA16783@sig21.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091230120428.5780@gmx.net>

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:04:28PM +0100, Hans Werner wrote:
> 
> testing in the Arch Linux Forums has shown that if one applies
> a patch which you posted to the linux-ide ML on 2008-11-21
> then the problem is no longer seen. Instead the kernel log shows
> that a spurious IRQ was cleared.
> 
> [PATCH #upstraem-fixes] ata_piix: detect and clear spurious IRQs
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122724081603679&w=2
> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=86454
> 
> What's the current status of this patch? Is it safe to use?
> What does it tell us about the Samsung N130/140?

FWIW, I just tested a current git kernel (v2.6.33-rc2-268-g45d28b0)
with Tejun's patch applied on my N130.  The ATA exception and hang is
indeed gone, just "ata1: clearing spurious IRQ" is logged.

I've see Tejun's comment in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14314
and I would like to add that the ATA irq is not shared.

 14:      43885          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
 15:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix


Thanks,
Johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-03 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-30 12:04 Samsung N130 ATA exception after 5min uptime -- Phoenix FailSafe issue? Hans Werner
2010-01-03 22:11 ` Johannes Stezenbach [this message]
2010-01-03 22:59   ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-04  0:41     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-01-04  0:56       ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-26 16:42 Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-28 19:19 ` Greg KH
2009-11-28 20:30   ` Robert Hancock
2009-11-28 21:34     ` Greg KH
2009-11-28 22:22       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-29  0:17         ` Greg KH
2009-11-29  0:51           ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-30  8:52             ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-30 10:21               ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-30 11:06                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100103221142.GA16783@sig21.net \
    --to=js@sig21.net \
    --cc=HWerner4@gmx.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmalygin@ked.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.