From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: regression in socket match caused by "net: Fix RPF to work with policy routing" Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:10:19 +1100 Message-ID: <20100105001019.GI2554@verge.net.au> References: <20100104100417.GA7699@verge.net.au> <1262600022.3568.2.camel@bigi> <20100104.103527.134676041.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:56212 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751612Ab0AEAKU (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 19:10:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100104.103527.134676041.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:35:27AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: jamal > Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:13:42 -0500 > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 21:04 +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> Hi Jamal, > >> > >> the patch "net: Fix RPF to work with policy routing", > >> which was added between 2.6.32-rc5 and rc6 seems to > >> cause a regression when using the socket match. > >> > >> In particular I'm using IP_TRANSPARENT as detailed > >> in Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt with the following > >> rules: > > > > Try latest tree - should be resolved. > > Specifically this commit: > > commit 28f6aeea3f12d37bd258b2c0d5ba891bff4ec479 > Author: Jamal Hadi Salim > Date: Fri Dec 25 17:30:22 2009 -0800 > > net: restore ip source validation Hi Jamal, Hi Dave, thanks, that resolves the problem that encountered.