From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9AFB6F01 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:17:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:17:33 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Bill Gatliff Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Create an of_i2c_gpiochip_add() Message-ID: <20100106201733.GA17857@pengutronix.de> References: <1262749898-19197-1-git-send-email-bgat@billgatliff.com> <4B44ED99.3020706@billgatliff.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" In-Reply-To: <4B44ED99.3020706@billgatliff.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Does the lack of response mean I'll be seeing these in an upcoming > kernel release? I'd like to, because then I could more easily push As long as nobody said "I picked it up", it will probably not. Patches regarding GPIO sometimes need a bit of time. Also, of_platform was in the discussion of being removed, this might complicate things, too. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktE790ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtcCgCfYYIyNp9l0GOSZ+TW1Q3aafm5 uDgAnRAj9UHaovca3JNgmyYmmU2GiOV2 =5mVR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--