From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
caiqian@redhat.com, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105105030.66bb8a0a@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On 01/05, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:11:47 -0800 (PST)
> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > This probably means that copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
> > > is not enough to clear the "this task wants single-stepping" copied
> > > from parent.
> >
> > I would suspect s390's TIF_SINGLE_STEP flag here. That flag means "a
> > single-step trap occurred". This is what causes do_single_step to be
> > called before returning to user mode, rather than the machine trap doing it
> > directly as is done in the other arch implementations.
>
> Just my thinking as well.
>
> > If I'm right, then "this task wants single-stepping" is not the problem,
> > and that really is fully cleared. In fact, looking at s390's copy_thread
> > (arch/s390/kernel/process.c) it clears out all the state that is actually
> > touched by user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step. So for
> > s390 the new fork.c call is actually superfluous AFAICT.
>
> /* Don't copy debug registers */
> memset(&p->thread.per_info, 0, sizeof(p->thread.per_info));
>
> Yep, the call from fork.c is indeed superfluous.
I can't explain this, but if I remove copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
the test-case below triggers "XXX" printk's from do_single_step() with or
without CONFIG_UTRACE. the patch is
--- arch/s390/kernel/traps.c~ 2009-12-22 10:41:52.909174198 -0500
+++ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 2010-01-05 11:03:55.006487697 -0500
@@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ void __kprobes do_single_step(struct pt_
}
if (tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
force_sig(SIGTRAP, current);
+ else
+ printk("XXX: %s/%d %d\n", current->comm, current->pid,
+ test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLE_STEP));
}
static void default_trap_handler(struct pt_regs * regs, long interruption_code)
Oleg.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <assert.h>
int main(void)
{
int pid, status;
if (!(pid = fork())) {
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME) == 0);
kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);
if (!fork())
return 43;
wait(&status);
return WEXITSTATUS(status);
}
for (;;) {
assert(pid == wait(&status));
if (WIFEXITED(status))
break;
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0,0) == 0);
}
assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 43);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1503844142.2061111261478093776.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1257887498.2061171261478252049.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-04 15:52 ` s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x) Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 16:16 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-04 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 19:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 21:11 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05 9:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 17:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 14:59 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-01-06 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 21:13 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:48 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-26 13:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:46 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08 8:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-08 10:25 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:08 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:16 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:44 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08 8:34 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:41 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 18:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-01-06 20:56 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:32 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 9:26 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:15 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-04 20:46 ` Roland McGrath
[not found] <1158952983.251101262791902387.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-06 15:33 ` caiqian
2010-01-06 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.