From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ring-buffer: Wrap a list.next reference with rb_list_head()
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:59:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100107020100.783759390@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100107015920.827200859@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0001-ring-buffer-Wrap-a-list.next-reference-with-rb_list_.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1484 bytes --]
From: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
This reference at the end of rb_get_reader_page() was causing off-by-one
writes to the prev pointer of the page after the reader page when that
page is the head page, and therefore the reader page has the RB_PAGE_HEAD
flag in its list.next pointer. This eventually results in a GPF in a
subsequent call to rb_set_head_page() (usually from rb_get_reader_page())
when that prev pointer is dereferenced. The dereferenced register would
characteristically have an address that appears shifted left by one byte
(eg, ffxxxxxxxxxxxxyy instead of ffffxxxxxxxxxxxx) due to being written at
an address one byte too high.
Signed-off-by: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <1262826727-9090-1-git-send-email-dhsharp@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 2326b04..d5b7308 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ rb_get_reader_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
*
* Now make the new head point back to the reader page.
*/
- reader->list.next->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
+ rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &cpu_buffer->head_page);
/* Finally update the reader page to the new head */
--
1.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 1:59 [PATCH 0/2][GIT PULL][2.6.33] ring-buffer: urgent changes Steven Rostedt
2010-01-07 1:59 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-01-07 1:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] ring-buffer: Add rb_list_head() wrapper around new reader page next field Steven Rostedt
2010-01-07 9:27 ` [PATCH 0/2][GIT PULL][2.6.33] ring-buffer: urgent changes Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100107020100.783759390@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.