From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: enable max8925
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:01:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100108000126.GE11239@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded00912210445v67175632i876b7909de8afae3@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Haojian,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:45:27AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 567add422a0d2214e037c3ed1b424b21776dfe34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:16 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] mfd: enable max8925
>
> Max8925 is a Power Management IC from Maxim Semiconductor.
>
> Do basic support on accessing MAX8925.
The patch looks quite good to me. I have some minor comments/suggestions
though:
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index f3b277b..2809869 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ endif
> obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1400_CORE) += ucb1400_core.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_DA903X) += da903x.o
> +max8925-objs := max8925-core.o max8925-i2c.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MAX8925) += max8925.o
No big deal, but it could just be:
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MAX8925) += max8925-core.o max8925-i2c.o
> +static int __get_irq_offset(struct max8925_chip *chip, int irq, int mode,
> + int *offset, int *bit)
> +{
> + if (!offset || !bit)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (chip->chip_id) {
> + case MAX8925_GPM:
> + *bit = irq % 8;
> + if (irq < 16) {
> + *offset = (mode) ? MAX8925_CHG_IRQ1_MASK
> + : MAX8925_CHG_IRQ1;
> + if (irq >= 8)
> + (*offset)++;
> + } else {
> + *offset = (mode) ? MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ1_MASK
> + : MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ1;
> + if (irq >= 24)
> + (*offset)++;
> + }
> + break;
To make the code more understandable, could we have some definitions for those
8, 16 and 24 ?
> +static irqreturn_t max8925_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(irq_status, MAX8925_NUM_IRQ);
> + struct max8925_chip *chip = data;
> + unsigned char status_buf[INT_STATUS_NUM << 1];
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + irq_status[0] = 0;
> +
> + /* all these interrupt status registers are read-only */
> + switch (chip->chip_id) {
> + case MAX8925_GPM:
> + ret = max8925_bulk_read(chip->i2c, MAX8925_CHG_IRQ1,
> + 4, status_buf);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + ret = max8925_bulk_read(chip->i2c, MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ1,
> + 4, &status_buf[4]);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + /* clear masked interrupt status */
> + status_buf[0] &= (~status_buf[2] & CHG_IRQ1_MASK);
> + irq_status[0] |= status_buf[0];
> + status_buf[1] &= (~status_buf[3] & CHG_IRQ2_MASK);
> + irq_status[0] |= (status_buf[1] << 8);
> + status_buf[4] &= (~status_buf[6] & ON_OFF_IRQ1_MASK);
> + irq_status[0] |= (status_buf[4] << 16);
> + status_buf[5] &= (~status_buf[7] & ON_OFF_IRQ2_MASK);
> + irq_status[0] |= (status_buf[5] << 24);
> + break;
> + case MAX8925_ADC:
> + ret = max8925_bulk_read(chip->i2c, MAX8925_TSC_IRQ,
> + 2, status_buf);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + /* clear masked interrupt status */
> + status_buf[0] &= (~status_buf[1] & TSC_IRQ_MASK);
> + irq_status[0] |= status_buf[0];
> + break;
> + default:
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + while (!bitmap_empty(irq_status, MAX8925_NUM_IRQ)) {
> + i = find_first_bit(irq_status, MAX8925_NUM_IRQ);
> + clear_bit(i, irq_status);
You could use for_each_bit() here.
> +static int __devinit device_gpm_init(struct max8925_chip *chip,
> + struct i2c_client *i2c,
> + struct max8925_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* mask all IRQs */
> + ret = max8925_set_bits(i2c, MAX8925_CHG_IRQ1_MASK, 0x7, 0x7);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + ret = max8925_set_bits(i2c, MAX8925_CHG_IRQ2_MASK, 0xff, 0xff);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + ret = max8925_set_bits(i2c, MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ1_MASK, 0xff, 0xff);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + ret = max8925_set_bits(i2c, MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ2_MASK, 0x3, 0x3);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + memcpy(chip->name, "GPM", 3);
Why not chip->name being a const char* and then chip->name = "GPM"; here ?
Either way, you really want it to be null terminated, which is not the case
here.
> +static int __devinit device_adc_init(struct max8925_chip *chip,
> + struct i2c_client *i2c,
> + struct max8925_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* mask all IRQs */
> + ret = max8925_set_bits(i2c, MAX8925_TSC_IRQ_MASK, 3, 3);
> +
> + memcpy(chip->name, "ADC", 3);
Same here.
The rest of the patch looks fine, as does the whole patchset.
Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-08 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 12:45 [PATCH 1/4] mfd: enable max8925 Haojian Zhuang
2009-12-22 4:35 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-23 9:41 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-12-23 10:45 ` Simon Horman
2010-01-08 0:01 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2010-01-08 10:34 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-08 11:45 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100108000126.GE11239@sortiz.org \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.