From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com>
Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com,
clark.becker@ridgerun.com, santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com,
diego.dompe@ridgerun.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
nsnehaprabha@ti.com, todd.fischer@ridgerun.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Davinci: DM365: Enable DaVinci Voice Codec support for DM365 EVM
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:21:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111162101.GA26771@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4B4987.1080507@ridgerun.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:53:43AM -0600, Miguel Aguilar wrote:
> Do you think that I still using the approach of having both codecs
> registered in the same kernel? or should I get back to the initial
> approach of selecting the wanted codec from the configuration menu?
I certainly think that this is the best approach at least up until the
machine driver in sound/soc/davinci. At that point we're currently
going to be forced to make a decision, though for reference boards with
both hooked up it'd be much better to make this a runtime decision.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 22:17 [PATCH 2/2] Davinci: DM365: Enable DaVinci Voice Codec support for DM365 EVM miguel.aguilar
2010-01-08 11:31 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-08 17:36 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-08 19:37 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 15:11 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-11 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 15:53 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-11 16:21 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-01-19 20:47 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-19 22:10 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-20 14:32 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-20 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 16:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-11 16:08 ` Miguel Aguilar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100111162101.GA26771@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=clark.becker@ridgerun.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=diego.dompe@ridgerun.com \
--cc=miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com \
--cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
--cc=santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com \
--cc=todd.fischer@ridgerun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.