From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata: retry link resume if necessary Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:57:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20100111225726.GA6591@kroah.com> References: <4B4A8994.8030600@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:44664 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750809Ab0AKW6H (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:58:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B4A8994.8030600@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , fengxiangjun , Jim Faulkner On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:14:44AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Interestingly, when SIDPR is used in ata_piix, writes to DET in > SControl sometimes get ignored leading to detection failure. Update > sata_link_resume() such that it reads back SControl after clearing DET > and retry if it's not clear. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Reported-by: fengxiangjun > Reported-by: Jim Faulkner > Cc: stable@kernel.org > --- > Greg, although this patch should be included in -stable release in > time, I think it should receive some more testing in devel branch for > at least a couple of -rc cycles as it changes very fundamental part of > hardreset protocol. Is there a protocol for delayed inclusion into > -stable? If not, I'll try to remember and ping you back after some > time but I'm almost sure that I'm gonna forget this. :-) I'll drop this into my "todo-stable" queue, and ping you back on this in a few weeks. Sound good? thanks, greg k-h