From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_qos.c: split switch external and end ports setup
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:43:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112104358.GJ26089@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0e08f231001070540y26b69cb3v82dddc1d7b7134b9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 08:40 Thu 07 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > This splits QoS related port parameters setup over switch external ports
> > and end ports. Such separation leaves us with simpler code and saves
> > some repeated flows in case of switch external ports (actually required
> > per switch and not per port).
>
> Not sure what you mean by required in this statement. What are you
> referring to as required per switch rather than per port ?
Duplicated per switch external port setup detection of common (per
switch) data - such as: number of ports, Sl2VL mapping capability
p0->port_info.capability_mask.
>
> > Another advantages: Optimized Sl2VL Mapping procedure can be implemented
> > easier using this model. A low level port QoS related parameters setup
> > infrastructure is ready for supporting per port QoS related configuration
> > (which hopefully will be implemented some days).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > index afeaa11..f54e995 100644
> > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static ib_api_status_t vlarb_update_table_block(osm_sm_t * sm,
> > osm_madw_context_t context;
> > uint32_t attr_mod;
> > unsigned vl_mask, i;
> > + ib_api_status_t status;
> >
> > vl_mask = (1 << (ib_port_info_get_op_vls(&p->port_info) - 1)) - 1;
> >
> > @@ -96,10 +97,17 @@ static ib_api_status_t vlarb_update_table_block(osm_sm_t * sm,
> > context.vla_context.set_method = TRUE;
> > attr_mod = ((block_num + 1) << 16) | port_num;
> >
> > - return osm_req_set(sm, osm_physp_get_dr_path_ptr(p),
> > - (uint8_t *) & block, sizeof(block),
> > - IB_MAD_ATTR_VL_ARBITRATION, cl_hton32(attr_mod),
> > - CL_DISP_MSGID_NONE, &context);
> > + status = osm_req_set(sm, osm_physp_get_dr_path_ptr(p),
> > + (uint8_t *) & block, sizeof(block),
> > + IB_MAD_ATTR_VL_ARBITRATION, cl_hton32(attr_mod),
> > + CL_DISP_MSGID_NONE, &context);
> > + if (status != IB_SUCCESS)
> > + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 6202 : "
> > + "failed to update VLArbitration tables "
> > + "for port %" PRIx64 " block %u\n",
> > + cl_ntoh64(p->port_guid), block_num);
> > +
> > + return status;
> > }
> >
> > static ib_api_status_t vlarb_update(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_physp_t * p,
> > @@ -157,6 +165,7 @@ static ib_api_status_t sl2vl_update_table(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_physp_t * p,
> > ib_slvl_table_t tbl, *p_tbl;
> > osm_node_t *p_node = osm_physp_get_node_ptr(p);
> > uint32_t attr_mod;
> > + ib_api_status_t status;
> > unsigned vl_mask;
> > uint8_t vl1, vl2;
> > int i;
> > @@ -181,70 +190,65 @@ static ib_api_status_t sl2vl_update_table(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_physp_t * p,
> > context.slvl_context.port_guid = osm_physp_get_port_guid(p);
> > context.slvl_context.set_method = TRUE;
> > attr_mod = in_port << 8 | out_port;
> > - return osm_req_set(sm, osm_physp_get_dr_path_ptr(p),
> > - (uint8_t *) & tbl, sizeof(tbl),
> > - IB_MAD_ATTR_SLVL_TABLE, cl_hton32(attr_mod),
> > - CL_DISP_MSGID_NONE, &context);
> > + status = osm_req_set(sm, osm_physp_get_dr_path_ptr(p),
> > + (uint8_t *) & tbl, sizeof(tbl),
> > + IB_MAD_ATTR_SLVL_TABLE, cl_hton32(attr_mod),
> > + CL_DISP_MSGID_NONE, &context);
> > + if (status != IB_SUCCESS)
> > + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 6203 : "
> > + "failed to update SL2VLMapping tables "
> > + "for port %" PRIx64 "i, attr_mod 0x%x\n",
> > + cl_ntoh64(p->port_guid), attr_mod);
> > + return status;
> > }
> >
> > -static ib_api_status_t sl2vl_update(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_port_t * p_port,
> > - osm_physp_t * p, uint8_t port_num,
> > - unsigned force_update,
> > - const struct qos_config *qcfg)
> > +static int qos_extports_setup(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_node_t *node,
> > + const struct qos_config *qcfg)
> > {
> > - ib_api_status_t status;
> > - uint8_t i, num_ports;
> > - ib_port_info_t *pi = &p_port->p_physp->port_info;
> > -
> > - if (!(pi->capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP))
> > - return IB_SUCCESS;
> > + osm_physp_t *p0, *p;
> > + unsigned force_update;
> > + unsigned num_ports = osm_node_get_num_physp(node);
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + unsigned i, j;
> >
> > - if (osm_node_get_type(osm_physp_get_node_ptr(p)) == IB_NODE_TYPE_SWITCH)
> > - num_ports = osm_node_get_num_physp(osm_physp_get_node_ptr(p));
> > - else
> > - num_ports = 1;
> > + for (i = 1; i < num_ports; i++) {
> > + p = osm_node_get_physp_ptr(node, i);
> > + force_update = p->need_update || sm->p_subn->need_update;
> > + p->vl_high_limit = qcfg->vl_high_limit;
> > + if (vlarb_update(sm, p, p->port_num, force_update, qcfg))
> > + ret = -1;
> > + }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < num_ports; i++) {
> > - status = sl2vl_update_table(sm, p, i, port_num, force_update,
> > - &qcfg->sl2vl);
> > - if (status != IB_SUCCESS)
> > - return status;
> > + p0 = osm_node_get_physp_ptr(node, 0);
> > + if (!(p0->port_info.capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP))
> > + return ret;
>
> Same comment on this as previous osm_qos patch comment on merging the
> SL2VL mapping capability check.
I answered there.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-12 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 19:41 [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <20091201194110.GA26753-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-29 15:05 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_slvl_map_rcv.c: fix port parsing on BE machine Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-29 15:07 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_slvl_map_rcv.c: verify port number values received from network Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-30 16:09 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f230912300809l7c794daat9490c64a2cf63525-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-30 16:27 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-30 16:56 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f230912300856v188d5900u9d82c94f5f9ae4a6-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-30 19:43 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-31 14:48 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f230912310648m4b03b9bdq92394a61866f0e26-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-03 17:02 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-04 19:12 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001041112k4cb7742bwb5ae7cade8704082-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-04 20:03 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-04 19:31 ` Hal Rosenstock
2009-12-29 15:06 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_slvl_map_rcv.c: fix mutex double release bug Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-29 16:29 ` [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-12-30 16:08 ` Hal Rosenstock
2010-01-04 17:01 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_qos.c: merge SL2VL mapping capability check Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-05 11:10 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_qos.c: split switch external and end ports setup Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-07 13:40 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001070540y26b69cb3v82dddc1d7b7134b9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-12 10:43 ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
2010-01-13 20:15 ` Hal Rosenstock
2010-01-07 13:38 ` [PATCH] opensm/osm_qos.c: merge SL2VL mapping capability check Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001070538q78453f91kd47c931087dfa735-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-12 10:35 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-13 20:13 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001131213r4a743d6boc1b07e9fadc773ac-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-16 20:27 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-23 12:25 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001230425j28ced479if608a75bb4216186-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-25 15:20 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-25 20:19 ` Hal Rosenstock
2010-01-05 11:18 ` [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-05 11:23 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-07 13:35 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001070535l382f1d54t7f6290607e52b196-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-12 10:55 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-13 20:14 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001131214w790b1f34s46cbbda8b6454ac3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-16 20:33 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-23 12:26 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f231001230426t2e48aa58pbcb2d3f1323c6e56-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-25 17:41 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-01-07 13:34 ` Hal Rosenstock
2010-01-06 19:13 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100112104358.GJ26089@me \
--to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.