All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>,
	isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de
Subject: Re: Can we remove pci_find_device() yet?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:18:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112211801.GA27999@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263329605.3011.8.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:53:25PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > How do I do that properly, in terms of PCI API?
> 
> One of our older controllers had a similar design error in that the two
> functions would sometimes have to be reset together.  The way we look
> for the second function is:
> 
> 	dev = pci_dev_get(dev1);
> 	while ((dev = pci_get_device(vendor_id, device_id, dev))) {
> 		if (dev->bus == dev1->bus &&
> 		    dev->devfn == dev1->devfn + 1) {
> 			dev2 = dev;
> 			break;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> I assume this is 'properly' since no-one has told me otherwise.

As of right now, yes, this is the "correct" way to do this.

I need to dig up the "let multiple drivers bind to a single device"
patch set to make this not necessary in the future.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-08  0:22 Can we remove pci_find_device() yet? Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-08  4:46 ` Greg KH
2010-01-11 19:46   ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-11 20:01     ` Greg KH
2010-01-12  0:21       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-12  0:46         ` Greg KH
2010-01-12 16:42       ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-12 17:39         ` Greg KH
2010-01-13  9:02           ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-12 20:34       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-12 20:53         ` Ben Hutchings
2010-01-12 21:18           ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-01-13 15:09             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-13 14:23       ` [PATCH] pci: push deprecated pci_find_device() function to last user Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-14  4:33         ` David Miller
2010-01-14  4:43           ` Greg KH
2010-01-14  8:12             ` David Miller
2010-01-14 16:28               ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-14 22:18                 ` [PATCH/REPOST] " Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-15 18:08                   ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-16 11:17                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-18 16:24                 ` [PATCH/v2] " Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-14 10:18       ` Can we remove pci_find_device() yet? Andi Kleen
2010-01-14 11:02         ` Alan Cox
2010-01-14 11:03           ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-14 12:39             ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-01-20 15:11           ` Tilman Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100112211801.GA27999@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
    --cc=isdn@linux-pingi.de \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.