From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re :Re: Re :Re: Bridging LACP (802.3ad) frames not working
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:30:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113083058.79d521c6@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cad0aa1001130229m18bff0b3mfd58c813c1b6a183@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:29:55 +0100
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/1/13 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>:
> > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:04:48 -0500
> > Ross Vandegrift <ross@kallisti.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:40:30PM +0000, jhautbois@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > This is exactly the problem.
> >> > But, sounds like it is not possible... ?
> >>
> >> You could run a custom version of the bridge driver to enable bridging
> >> of frames sent to the bridge-management MAC addresses. Some folks
> >> have talked about doing similar things to enable bridging of STP.
> >>
> >> Doing that with STP makes a bit more sense to me (since there are
> >> valid networks that could be constructed that way). But you'll be
> >> breaking a pretty fundamental assumption of LACP....
> >
> > Recent kernels will forward link local frames as long as STP is disabled.
> > Older kernels will not.
> >
> > The assumption is that if STP is enabled, then it will be managing
> > control plane.
>
> Well, I have a 2.6.31 kernel. And LACP is not forwarded, even when STP
> is disabled.
> I don't understand what you mean ?
I meant they get processed locally, before that they were dropped.
The best solution is to write an ebtables rule to forward them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-13 10:29 [Bridge] Re :Re: Re :Re: Bridging LACP (802.3ad) frames not working Jean-Michel Hautbois
2010-01-13 16:30 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-01-13 16:47 ` [Bridge] Re :Re: " jhautbois
2010-01-13 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-12 22:58 [Bridge] " richardvoigt
2010-01-13 9:26 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2010-01-12 21:32 [Bridge] " Ross Vandegrift
2010-01-12 21:40 ` [Bridge] Re :Re: " jhautbois
2010-01-12 22:04 ` Ross Vandegrift
2010-01-13 0:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100113083058.79d521c6@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jhautbois@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.