From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@slind.org>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv3] List per-process file descriptor consumption when hitting file-max
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:57:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113225715.GE19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100113224459.GA21934@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:44:59PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > When a file descriptor limit is hit, display the top consumers of
> > descriptors so that it is possible to identify and fix those which
> > leak them.
> >
> > Two new sysctl tunables are introduced:
> > * file-max-consumers -- number of processes to display (defaults
> > to 10);
> > * file-max-rate-limit -- time interval between subsequent dumps
> > (defaults to 10 seconds).
>
> That *still* doesn't answer the most important question: what for?
BTW, even leaving that (and obvious deadlocks) aside, this stuff is
monumentally bogus. A process can easily have shitloads of opened
descriptors and very few opened files (see dup() and friends). Conversely,
you can have shitloads of opened files and not a single opened descriptor
(see mmap()). And you are calling that when we have too many opened
struct file.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 11:38 [PATCH] [RFC] List per-process file descriptor consumption when hitting file-max alexander.shishckin
2009-07-29 16:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2009-07-29 16:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2009-07-30 12:40 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-11 12:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2009-10-11 12:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2010-01-10 16:34 ` [RFC][PATCHv2] " Alexander Shishkin
2010-01-13 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-11 9:38 ` [RFC][PATCHv3] " Alexander Shishkin
2010-01-11 12:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-13 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:44 ` Al Viro
2010-01-13 22:57 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100113225715.GE19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtuoso@slind.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.