From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/8] ARM: S5P6440: Add Board support file
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:28:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100114062848.GP3738@trinity.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263426643-14987-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:50:43AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch adds Samsung's SMDK6440 board support file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e3a49af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5p6440/mach-smdk6440.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +*/
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/timer.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/serial_core.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> +#include <asm/mach/map.h>
> +
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/map.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/irq.h>
> +#include <asm/mach-types.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/regs-serial.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/s5p6440.h>
> +#include <plat/clock.h>
> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> +#include <plat/devs.h>
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> +#include <plat/pll.h>
> +
> +#define S5P6440_UCON_DEFAULT (S3C2410_UCON_TXILEVEL | \
> + S3C2410_UCON_RXILEVEL | \
> + S3C2410_UCON_TXIRQMODE | \
> + S3C2410_UCON_RXIRQMODE | \
> + S3C2410_UCON_RXFIFO_TOI | \
> + S3C2443_UCON_RXERR_IRQEN)
> +
> +#define S5P6440_ULCON_DEFAULT S3C2410_LCON_CS8
> +
> +#define S5P6440_UFCON_DEFAULT (S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE | \
> + S3C2440_UFCON_TXTRIG16 | \
> + S3C2410_UFCON_RXTRIG8)
> +
> +static struct s3c2410_uartcfg smdk6440_uartcfgs[] __initdata = {
> + [0] = {
> + .hwport = 0,
> + .flags = 0,
> + .ucon = S5P6440_UCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ulcon = S5P6440_ULCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ufcon = S5P6440_UFCON_DEFAULT,
> + },
> + [1] = {
> + .hwport = 1,
> + .flags = 0,
> + .ucon = S5P6440_UCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ulcon = S5P6440_ULCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ufcon = S5P6440_UFCON_DEFAULT,
> + },
> + [2] = {
> + .hwport = 2,
> + .flags = 0,
> + .ucon = S5P6440_UCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ulcon = S5P6440_ULCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ufcon = S5P6440_UFCON_DEFAULT,
> + },
> + [3] = {
> + .hwport = 3,
> + .flags = 0,
> + .ucon = S5P6440_UCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ulcon = S5P6440_ULCON_DEFAULT,
> + .ufcon = S5P6440_UFCON_DEFAULT,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct map_desc smdk6440_iodesc[] = {
> +};
I'd really like to see this gone and just pass (NULL, 0) as the first
arguments to s5p_init_io().
> +static struct platform_device *smdk6440_devices[] __initdata = {
> +};
> +
> +static void __init smdk6440_map_io(void)
> +{
> + s5p_init_io(smdk6440_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(smdk6440_iodesc),
> + (u32)S5P_SYS_ID);
This does not match the declaration of s5p_init_io() which only has two
arguments. The second comment is why is S5P_SYS_ID being cast to (u32),
shouldn't the s5p_init_io() take the correct type?
If S5P_SYS_ID is a pointer to the identity register which might change
depending on the SoC, then why is it called S5P and not S5P6440_SYS_ID ?
> + s3c24xx_init_clocks(12000000);
> + s3c24xx_init_uarts(smdk6440_uartcfgs, ARRAY_SIZE(smdk6440_uartcfgs));
> +}
> +
> +static void __init smdk6440_machine_init(void)
> +{
> + platform_add_devices(smdk6440_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(smdk6440_devices));
> +}
> +
> +MACHINE_START(SMDK6440, "SMDK6440")
> + /* Maintainer: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> */
> + .phys_io = S5P_PA_UART & 0xfff00000,
> + .io_pg_offst = (((u32)S5P_VA_UART) >> 18) & 0xfffc,
> + .boot_params = S5P_PA_SDRAM + 0x100,
> +
> + .init_irq = s5p6440_init_irq,
> + .map_io = smdk6440_map_io,
> + .init_machine = smdk6440_machine_init,
> + .timer = &s3c24xx_timer,
> +MACHINE_END
> --
> 1.6.2.5
>
--
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-14 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-13 23:50 [PATCH v5 6/8] ARM: S5P6440: Add Board support file Kukjin Kim
2010-01-14 6:28 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100114062848.GP3738@trinity.fluff.org \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.