From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001152350.06930.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891001151447u39ad494ah6861926db0c50907@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 15 January 2010 23:47:00 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I wonder if a possible failure here might be that the box gets under
> load and some DMA allocation actually gives back less memory than what
> was requested., hrm, but even then we'd still tell hardware it has the
> whole desired length we intended...
>
> Not sure... I haven't reviewed this code in ages.
>
> > However, it had different failure symptoms this time.
> > Last time it failed, the AP was completely dead. No beacons, etc..
> > This time it was still beaconing, but auth failed:
>
> Can you reproduce? Do you know if anything particular happened at this time?
No, there was nothing special happening. I was just sending the previous mail
and a few seconds later I noticed that wpa_supplicant lost connection
and failed to gain a new authentication.
> > Trying to associate with 00:1d:0f:b9:df:2d (SSID='quimby-net' freq=2472 MHz)
> > Authentication with 00:1d:0f:b9:df:2d timed out.
> >
> > A machine reboot was _not_ needed this time to revive the card.
> > Module unload cycle was enough to bring it back to life.
> >
> > I'm really unsure what's going on and if these two failures are related
> > to each other. Probably not...
>
> Anyway you can burp your box sooner (replace the PCI connector) to
> rule that out?
Yes, I'm going to replace the extender over the weekend.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 10:52 Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails Michael Buesch
2010-01-11 16:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-11 16:35 ` Larry Finger
2010-01-11 16:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-11 22:36 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:29 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:40 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-15 22:50 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2010-01-21 12:05 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-21 15:57 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001152350.06930.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.