All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:20:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263609721-3921-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

Please change title of patch to:

	pci: pci_read_bridge_bases rejects MMIO ranges starting at 0

* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>:
> that is wrong.
> 
> exposed by that patch that doesn's shrink pci bridge res.

Ok, I don't understand how this patch interacts with patch 4/11.
Am I correct in understanding that something in 4/11 exposes a
problem that 3/11 fixes?

I'm just looking for a better explanation of *why* we need this
patch here.

> -v2: change to "bar reading" to "reg reading"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 11824d7..70b1f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -316,13 +316,17 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
>  		limit |= (io_limit_hi << 16);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (base <= limit) {
> +	if (base <= limit && base) {

This construct (and the similar one below) is a little
non-idiomatic.

	if (base && base <= limit)

reads a lot more naturally to me.

thanks,
/ac

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-16  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-16  2:41 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  3:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 10:10     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] pci: add failed_list to record failed one for pci_bus_assign_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:05   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:20   ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] pci: don't shrink bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:38   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] pci: introduce pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:47   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] pci: pciehp clean flow in pciehp_configure_device Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] pci: pciehp second try to get big range for pcie devices Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:52   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] pci: pci_bridge_release_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:42 ` [PATCH 10/11] pciehp: add support for bridge resource reallocation Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:59   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  5:22     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  9:34     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 23:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-01-17 17:34         ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-17 22:35           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:42 ` [PATCH 11/11] pci: set PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in pci_bridge_check_ranges Yinghai Lu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-16 11:07 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.