Re: [PATCH] tests/subnet_discover: discover test utility

[Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 15:11 Wed 13 Jan     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > In my tests I found that '8' is more optimal number (the tool works
> > faster and without drops) than '4' used in OpenSM.
> >
> > Of course it would be helpful to run this over bigger cluster than
> > what I have to see that the results are consistent.
> 
> This is exactly my concern. Not only cluster size but use cases
> including concurrent diag discover and SM operation where SMPs are
> heavily in use.

Was it investigated? What was a conclusions?

> There already have been a number of reports of dropped SMPs on this
> list with the current diags and this change will only make things
> worse IMO.
>
> Also, the OpenSM default should be at least as large as the diags for this.

I don't know where concurrent MADs are used in the current "diags", do
you?

This utility is not 'diags' at all. It is placed in ibsim/tests and I
wrote it for test purpose.

Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html