From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:38:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100119083803.GA17904@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Hello,
I'm looking into making PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time. I saw a
patch for it that already made it a few times on the list[1].
I'm not yet done, but first want to announce that I look into that to
prevent duplicate work---so if you intended to do the same let's look
together---and to post some clean up patches that are the result up to
now of my digging in the boot code.
I will send now three patches in reply to this mail, and later hopefully
more.
Best regards
Uwe
[1] e.g. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/53793/
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-19 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 8:38 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: don't define unused symbol initrd_phys for zImage Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: add a comment to __atags_pointer describing where it's set Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: remove support for old way to pass kernel parameters Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 9:13 ` [PATCH] arm: deprecate " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 20:26 ` make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished) Ryan Mallon
2010-01-20 0:55 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 2:21 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 2:32 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 14:39 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 1:28 ` jassi brar
2010-01-21 2:15 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-01-21 11:57 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:48 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 11:43 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 15:22 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-22 12:32 ` jassi brar
2010-01-20 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-20 8:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-22 11:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 17:32 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 19:32 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-01-30 21:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] zImage: don't hard code the stack size twice Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] uImage: require passing a LOADADDR when building with RUNTIME_PHYSOFFSET Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Allow PHYS_OFFSET to be runtime determined Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:51 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:52 ` [PATCH] arm: remove bit-rotten STANDALONE_DEBUG for decompressor Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-12 11:03 ` [PULL REQUEST] runtime physoffset [Was: change boot requirements] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-08 12:15 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-03-22 21:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100119083803.GA17904@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.